Amd Ryzen 5 Gamer
Generally, AMD Ryzen 5 microprocessors contain either 4 cores that can process 8 threads at once or 6 cores that can support 12 threads at once. This makes quad-core Ryzen 5 processors ideal choices for everyday, general computer use, with some of the faster processors even being suitable for gaming. AMD’s chip maintained its dominance on synthetic graphics tests, scoring nearly twice as much on FurMark, a benchmark that renders animal hair. On 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited, Ryzen 5 scored a strong 73,701, edging out the Core i5 processor’s score of 62,127.
You probably won’t need a Threadripper CPU, but it’ll be awesome to have one. It’s for advanced users only who need to push their systems beyond their limits. The Ryzen 9 family is AMD’s latest batch of computing magic, packing in up to 12 cores and 24 threads and are a great middle-ground between the Ryzen 7 and Threadripper.
Ryzen Mobile instantly makes AMD a serious player in the mainstream laptop space. In most use cases, a Ryzen Mobile chip is either a little faster or within striking range of the Intel 8th Gen Core. In fact, the only test that was a strong win for Intel was Geekbench 4; a few gtx 1090 milliseconds of time in app-opens and 6 minutes of battery life are well within the margin of error. AMD’s processor also offers significantly better integrated graphics, even though the graphics performance is not strong enough to turn a regular ultrabook into a gaming rig.
What’s most interesting about these and the other Ryzen processors is they are all unlocked, allowing users to overclock them to squeeze out every last bit of performance. While the performance exhibited by Intel’s 6-core Tiger Lake architecture processor is curious by many users, it is built on 7nm Zen 3 architecture in a short time CPU-Z test. The X470 platform also gives us room to tinker with overclocking. Results in games were a little behind the Ryzen X, by a “little” I’m talking around five percent behind. Around five percent in FPS won’t destroy immersion but does show just how close processors are.
I bought this CPU wondering if it was going to be an upgrade over my Intel I5 6600K. I can honestly say it is. In a number of newer game titles my old processor was running at 100% cpu usage and causing stuttering in those games. Overclocking the processor did help in those titles however it was still not enough.
The Ryzen 5 chips make digital audio workstation performance more accesible than similarly-priced Intel parts, and that’s a major win for AMD. However, the Core i7-6800K’s total dominance of these tests suggests the Ryzen parts could do with more memory bandwidth to play with. At the punishing buffer size of 64, the older and lower-clocked chips in our lineup can’t handle the VI test at all. The Ryzen X redeems itself nicely over the i5-7500, and the Core i7-7700K only barely edges by the Ryzen s. The Core i7-6800K turns in a freakishly good performance here, though, and we can only presume that’s because of its scads of memory bandwidth compared to every other chip in our lineup. In the CPU-only phase of our testing, performance scales as expected with cores and threads, save for the Core i7-6800K’s surprise win.
While the Ryzen X is the cheapest AMD 6 core option, it definitely isn’t the overall budget 6 core champ. That title goes to the Intel Core i F which retails for $159.99 US and $157.99 US . Even the latest Core i F costs $179.99 US at Newegg and $174.99 US at Amazon.
16 MBGPU—TDP65W95W95WPrice$220$190$240The new 3700X and 3800X are for serious productivity. A massive 32MB of L3 cache is joined by high clock speeds and great overclock support, particularly in the more pricy 3800X. 16 MBGPU—-TDP65 W65 W65 W95 WPrice$126$138$117$146The new 3400G and 3600X processors are some pretty hot chips. You’ve got the latest Vega 11 in the former, while the latter comes with a whopping 32MB of L3 cache, making it ideal for intense workloads.
Intel’s chip scored a little higher on a couple of tests that didn’t require much graphics might, but the overall takeaway is that AMD’s mobile processors are now as good if not better than Intel’s. To see which processors reign supreme, we got ahold of two nearly identical HP Envy x360 2-in-1s — one with Ryzen 5 and one with Intel Core i5 — and put them through our own set of tests. Overall, the Ryzen Mobile-powered laptop impressed us by getting much-higher graphics gigabyte gtx 1060 3gb scores than its competitor. You see in AMD Zen 2 processors, each Compute Die had two Core Complexes , which each had 4 cores and 16MB of L3 cache. This means in single-core workloads, the core would only have direct access to 16MB of cache, and would have to reach outside of the CCX if more was needed. With Zen 3, however, each CCX now has 8 cores and 32MB of L3 cache, so the amount of cache that each individual core has direct access to has doubled.
This cuts latency down dramatically and boosts single-core performance higher than we’ve ever seen. Releasing on November 5, 2020, the gtx 1090000 series of processors have been gracing us with its presence for some time now. The extra processor cores offered by Ryzen compared to Intel’s Kaby and Coffee Lake CPUs means that certain tasks will run MUCH faster.