Benchmarking Amd Ryzen 5 5500u Linux Performance With A $450 Lenovo Laptop
The two main families of processors — Core and Ryzen, respectively — use 3, 5, 7, and 9 to differentiate the CPUs. A Ryzen 3 processor won’t be able to outpace a Ryzen 7, for example. And just like Intel, AMD keeps everything simple by only using a few model numbers, as well as the gtx 1080 8gb “X” suffix. Jacob describes himself as the hardware team’s resident wildcard. He is currently on an unremitting quest to create the world’s ugliest gaming PC and is often found tinkering on the testbench in a vain attempt to resurrect another failed RGB experiment gone awry.
What’s most interesting about these and the other Ryzen processors is they are all unlocked, allowing users to overclock them to squeeze out every last bit of performance. While the performance exhibited by Intel’s 6-core Tiger Lake architecture processor is curious by many users, it is built on 7nm Zen 3 architecture in a short time CPU-Z test. The X470 platform also gives us room to tinker with overclocking. Results in games were a little behind the Ryzen X, by a “little” I’m talking around five percent behind. Around five percent in FPS won’t destroy immersion but does show just how close processors are.
In late 2020, AMD debuted the fourth-generation of Ryzen-based Desktop CPUs including the high-end Ryzen 9 processor. AMD’s latest line of processors are primed to compete against Intel’s current Core i3, i5, gtx 1080 8gb i7 and i9 offering. For a more focused look at how the Ryzen 9 changes things for AMD, check out this review. 3DMark Time Spy is a popular and effective benchmarking tool for rating gaming performance.
Ryzen Mobile instantly makes AMD a serious player in the mainstream laptop space. In most use cases, a Ryzen Mobile chip is either a little faster or within striking range of the Intel 8th Gen Core. In fact, the only test that was a strong win for Intel was Geekbench 4; a few milliseconds of time in app-opens and 6 minutes of battery life are well within the margin of error. AMD’s processor also offers significantly better integrated graphics, even though the graphics performance is not strong enough to turn a regular ultrabook into a gaming rig.
Intel’s chip scored a little higher on a couple of tests that didn’t require much graphics might, but the overall takeaway is that AMD’s mobile processors are now as good if not better than Intel’s. To see which processors reign supreme, we got ahold of two nearly identical HP Envy x360 2-in-1s — one with Ryzen 5 and one with Intel Core i5 — and put them through our own set of tests. Overall, the Ryzen Mobile-powered laptop impressed us by getting much-higher graphics scores than its competitor. You see in AMD Zen 2 processors, each Compute Die had two Core Complexes , which each had 4 cores and 16MB of L3 cache. This means in single-core workloads, the core would only have direct access to 16MB of cache, and would have to reach outside of the CCX if more was needed. With Zen 3, however, each CCX now has 8 cores and 32MB of L3 cache, so the amount of cache that each individual core has direct access to has doubled.
If you’re going to test cpu encoding performance, do not use a source that is in a delivery format, always use a source that is either uncompressed, losslessly compressed or in a intermediate mastering format. The quality dies as soon as the screen changes a lot from frame to frame – i.e. any video game. The kids becoming youtube millionaires definitely use hardware accelerated encode , while traditional “pro” media for high end TV/movies use CPU as you said because the quality. Nobody doing serious video encoding uses hardware accelerators for final encodes.