Connected technology and and customized cleaning comes to life with the Dyson Link app, available for both iOS and Android devices. From across the room, or across the world, the Link app allows the cleaning times to be scheduled and adjusted whenever connected to wifi. Switch between the three cleaning levels and create zones throughout the house which allows custom behaviours in each area.
I was able to do so successfully, but the voice commands are not robust enough. You can only turn the vacuum on or off, not command it to vacuum a specific section of the house. I was hoping I could tell it to vacuum a room I wasn’t planning on using at the time as a work around for the app not having that functionality, but this is also not possible. I guess the real issue is that for my house, the vacuum needs to go back to the dock to recharge before finishing. This creates a 45 minute vacuum cycle, 2 hour recharge, and 45 minute vacuum cycle for a total of almost 4 hours.
Again, this has quite a few similarities to newer V-Series models. The biggest strike against good usability has got to be the 20 minute run time. For many homes, this may simply not be enough time to get the job done.
Although we didn’t have a test for it, pet hair would be the one debris it may struggle with, simply because it uses the bristle brushroll instead of the rubberized brushroll. This is just something you may want to keep in mind if you have long-haired pets in your household. The 890 cleans using central bissell crosswave cordless dual rubberized brushrolls to agitate and suck up debris, and a spinning side brush, which helps address the corners and edges. The motor in the Roomba 890 is the same motor that is in the Roomba 960. It has a sleek black body with the central “CLEAN” button and similar layout and controls.
The iRobot Roomba S9+ is self-emptying when it reaches a certain level in its bin. The debris is captured in a 14.9oz / 440ml replaceable dust bag in the charging and emptying station. This makes it an awesome choice for those who suffer from allergies because all the dust is contained, and there is no fear of emptying any of it back out again if you open it.
TheDyson V10cordless stick vacuum is Dyson’s newest stick model to date. It features the highest level of suction and lowest maintenance costs of any of the Dyson V-Series stick vacuums. The 960 uses the same motor that is found in the 800 Series Roombas, which gives it a slightly shorter run time and less power on carpet than then Roomba 980 model. If your house is primarily hardwoods, it is likely that you won’t notice the change in performance between the 960 and the 980, but for carpeted areas, this could be a different story. The on-board cycles help to provide a powerful suction using the digital V2 Dyson motor.
Roborock says it will manage up to three hours of continuous cleaning in its least powerful mode. During testing, we used the middle-of-the-road ‘balanced mode,’ which meant 30 minutes of cleaning bissell crosswave cordless over an area of 20 square meters depleted the battery by 20% – a decent level of performance. I have my 360 Heurist cleaning hard flooring and a carpeted area and it performs really well on both.
WIRED Recommends is your definitive guide to the best technology. Every product featured has been properly tested by WIRED reviewers. Read our list of the best gadgets for our favourite picks in every category.
When you think of the latest and greatest cleaning technology, you’re likely to immediately jump to robot vacuum cleaners – the gadgetry-filled discs of convenience. While robo-vacuums are pretty great, there’s still plenty of power and innovation to be had with traditional vacuums too – and Dyson is leading the way. The cleaning performance of the Roomba 890 is not that much different than the performance of the 690 or even 900 Series robot vacuums. On hardwoods, the 890 was able to capture about 98% of debris tested.
The details of the upcoming product were recently seen in an FCC. The new design in images look much flatter and wider than the former. The design of the previous two models made them unsuitable for the typical households, especially when it came to vacuuming under furniture or in narrow areas.