Amd Ryzen 7 3700x & Ryzen 9 3900x Review
Fortunately, they are easy to control and match to the rest of your RGB set-up. At this price point, though, you can’t expect a lot of bells and whistles if you’re uncompromising on performance, like the TUF is. Performance-wise, the ASUS AM4 TUF Gaming X570 stacks up well to its competitors.
Thanks to the extra threads available via SMT, the 3700X is about 18 percent faster than the 9700K in multithreaded workloads. Include all of the benchmarks and it’s about a 7 percent lead for AMD overall—and at a lower price, since you’d still need an aftermarket cooler with the 9700K. All of the benchmarks that follow were done running the latest Windows 10 May 2019 update, with updated drivers and BIOS firmware. Unlike some other sites (and I’m not faulting their testing protocols. It’s just not how I do things), all CPUs are tested with high speed DDR CL14 memory, with XMP memory profiles enabled.
In most tests, it’s right in the thick of things, offering more than adequate overclocking support. PCMag.com is a leading authority on technology, delivering Labs-based, independent reviews of the latest products and services. Our expert industry analysis and practical solutions help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology. This test, as run with our test file, is mostly useful for highlighting the vast differences between low-end and high-end chips, and the similarities between chips within these two categories. Nearly every chip in the chart below completed the test in about 20 seconds, from the Core i to the Threadripper 2950X, except for the budget-desktop-class Ryzen G, which took 34 seconds.
Please check these components and perform temperature tests to see if you experience overheating with the Ryzen X. Altogether, the Asus ROG Strix B450-F Gaming is the best option available for gamers on budget. It offers incredible value when compared to other mid-range motherboards in its class, and blows them out of the water with its overclocking prowess. You will definitely find a lot to love with this board, especially since there really isn’t much to dislike. The only real downside is the price, which is a bit higher than you would expect.
On Intel, you can at least play with individual core multipliers, so maybe 5.0GHz on all cores, and 5.2GHz on 1/2-core loads. If you manually overclock an AMD chip, it’s one multiplier, period. So you might lose singlethreaded performance for a slight gain in multithreaded performance. gtx 1080 8gb PBO allows the CPU to exceed the default clockspeeds depending on thermals, though you’ll generally want liquid cooling and still only get an extra 200MHz at most. Hit the showers and leave the field of games behind, and differences between the 9700K and 3700X swap places.
On the question of value, it’s a big thumbs up for AMD and the Ryzen X. Shaving off a couple of hundred megahertz here or there has allowed for considerable power savings, too. The 65W TDP of the Ryzen X dramatically cuts this chip’s thirst compared to its predecessors.
Although the 3700x has more cores, the 5600x has a faster render speed and more performance in Premier pro and most of the adobe suite products. The Ryzen X, meanwhile, also punched well above its weight and offering similar performance to the Core i9-9900K in Adobe Premiere Pro, at least in my 4K video gtx 1080 8gb export, is rather damning for Intel given the price difference. Ultimately, what this all boils down to is for everything content creation/multi-threaded, AMD is now absolutely dominant except if you have piles of cash to spend on an Intel Core i9-9980XE and rendering/exporting time is money.