Pny Geforce® Gtx 1660 Super 6gb Single Fan
It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead. Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters. Finishing up the gaming benchmarks we have Middle-earth Shadow of War and here the 1660 Super was 19% faster than the base model and just 3% slower than the Ti version, so again another excellent result. The fact the Super can match the higher-spec gigabyte gtx 1060 3gb silicon of the Ti with just a slight memory speed bump does show that those 128 CUDA cores don’t really amount to much when it comes to gaming performance. If you don’t have sufficient memory that will hold things up as system resources will need to be pulled from elsewhere to supplement your graphics card. And if the memory is slow you’re going to have to wait longer for it all to be pulled together and a frame to be displayed on your screen.
Overall the Super card is between 10 and 13 percent faster than the regular 1660 at 1080p resolution in the games I tested. That’s not too shabby and certainly warrants the “super” moniker as it’s not some measly five percent bump. At 1440p the uplift is largely the same aside from The Witcher 3, which saw a 24 percent bump in performance. In the rest of the titles, performance fell between 10 and 12 percent overall. Though it’s “made for 1080p gaming” it’s also pretty good at 1440p, hitting 60fps in most titles at max settings.
If you have any questions please feel free and just a phone call or email. The thing is though, I don’t care much for the whole ray-tracing thing, and even though the RTX 2060 CAN do it, doing so leads to a big performance hit. What I’m more interested in is the extra 2GBs of RAM the 2060 Super offers over the non-Super and the two GTX cards I’m also looking at. Aside from competitors within AMD’s own ranks, a likely alternative is Intel’s Core i5-9600K, at least until cheaper 9th generation CPUs appear.
The factory-overclocked EVGA GTX 1660 Super SC Ultra brings performance close to the more-expensive GTX 1660 Ti, while the cooling solution allows for quiet operation while gaming. Nvidia’s new Super card soars close to the performance of the GTX 1660 Ti. If you want to know about the inner workings of CPUs, GPUs, or SSDs, he’s your man. He subsists off a steady diet of crunchy silicon chips and may actually be a robot. I have to admit, when rumors started circulating several months back of a ‘Super’ refresh of the 1660 and 1650, I thought they were bunk.
The GTX 1650 Super sports 1,280 stream processors , along with 80 TMUs and 32 ROPs. Base clocks are reported to be 1,530 MHz, with a boost clock of 1,725 MHz, all fitting in a 100W TDP. With the specification gtx 1090 bump, we expect the GTX 1650 Super to be a much more capable 1080p card than the vanilla version. Of course, we still need to see where AMD’s RX 5500 cards land, both in pricing as well as performance.
The Turing GPU architecture is a genuine advancement over the last-gen Pascal design, offering gaming improvements well beyond the ray tracing noise. We’ve been big fans of the Nvidia GTX 1660 Ti since it first arrived delivering the highest gaming performance we’ve seen in a GPU that costs less than $300. So long as we were talking MSRP versions anyways… there have been some factory overclocked cards topping the $300 mark and they’re harder to recommend. Compared to the similarly priced AMD RX 590 there’s no competition here at all, as the 1660 Super is faster across the board by a decent margin, so AMD will need a price cut to remain competitive at this price point. It also smokes the GTX 1060, making it a very decent upgrade to that GPU, as it runs between 20 and 30 percent faster in most games. The addition of a Walmart Protection Plan adds extra protection from the date of purchase.
So if you’re wondering about the competing AMD parts in this performance range, you’ll have to wait a bit until the company decides to ship the RX 5500. The other interesting aspect about the GTX 16-series is the lack of hardware ray tracing features. There’s driver support for DirectX Raytracing , but generally speaking you won’t get much above 30 fps even at 1080p with the GTX 1660 models. With the RTX 2060 now starting at around $320 (and I’ve seen sales drop the price as low as $300), the GTX 1660 Ti is in a tough spot. I’d almost always encourage gamers to upgrade to the RTX 2060 over the 1660 Ti, since it’s only about $50 more. With the 1660 Super price of $229, that’s a big enough jump that the Super feels like a viable option.