Geforce Gtx 1660 Super
Ultimately the GTX 1660 is exactly what it needs to be – much quicker than the GTX GB, a match for the RX 590 and a huge step up from the GTX GB, which unless you’re picking it up for less than $160/£150, really isn’t worth it now. Far Cry 5 was tiny bit slower on the Scan PC than on my own test system, but only by a couple of frames per second, with the Pc maintaining a minimum frame rate of at least 67fps, with clear scope for gaming at higher resolutions. Stepping up to 1440p and the GTX 1660 Ti extended its lead over the cheaper Turing card and only the RTX 2060 managed to reach over 60fps consistently.
Their hardware is superior, the graphics are phenomenal – in Borderlands 3 there are foggy valleys that looked incredible, with drifting, whispy fog; I’ve never seen graphics done so well! I’ve run it one three combined into one huge playscreen and it worked flawlessly. For the money this is the best upgrade before the really expensive cutting edge cards; this one will keep you in the game for years! The EVGA card I received for review is short and kind of stubby, but definitely not as thicc as the really fat versions EVGA has offered previously. It’s eight inches long and features an aluminum heatsink that covers most of the GPU, with two fans overlaid on top of it that feature EVGA logos. There’s no RGB lighting, but there is a backplate, which is a bit of a surprise on a semi-budget GPU.
However this means it’s outgunned by the GTX 1660 Super by around 20% , which is why AMD is instead using the card to stake their claim to the $199 price point. So for buyers who absolutely can’t go above $200, it’s an option; but at this point GTX 1660 Super doesn’t face any major competition. At current prices, the $229 GTX 1660 Super is $50 cheaper than the GTX 1660 Ti. And with the card only trailing NVIDIA’s top 1660 card by about 4%, I would argue that the GTX 1660 Ti has been rendered redundant at this point; the GTX 1660 Ti isn’t far enough ahead to provide much in the way of value. Instead, the next real step up after the GTX 1660 Super is the GTX 2060, which is 22% faster, but running at around $100 more expensive. At this point, the partners have been shipping TU116-based cards for over 6 months, so they have been able to hone their GTX 1660 family designs.
Unsurprisingly, the GTX 1660 Super occupies the same general slot within NVIDIA’s product stacks as the easier GTX 1660 cards. Which means that for system builders and upgraders alike, NVIDIA is pitching the card at the same general audience as before. That the GTX 1660 Super offers better performance for the price is definitely an improvement here, and it will presumably ensure NVIDIA gets to stay ahead of AMD’s impending cards.
GIGABYTE provides new innovated 3D sensing product -Time of Flight camera. ToF camera is a special purpose, low-cost smart solution with novel 3D imaging capture technology. The ToF camera includes high-performance advanced analytics as a standard feature, improving measurement accuracy and performance when compared to the current generation of RGB and stereoscopic cameras.
In our launch-day review we concluded it was the first GPU release in some time that we’d come away feeling completely pleased. The 1660 Ti offered GTX 1070-like performance for a slight price premium over the GTX GB. Without any competition from AMD it was gtx 1080 8gb a pretty good result. But, for now, the RX 590 is still a decent gaming card, especially now it’s dropped well below the $200 mark, but the GTX 1660 does still outperform it and will likely join it down the price scale once the Super hits the shelves.
NvidiaWe haven’t had time to play around with the new feature yet, but it sure sounds cool on paper. Don’t be surprised to see the original model’s new pricing settle in around there. The first graph shows the relative performance of the videocard compared to the 10 other common videocards in terms of PassMark G3D Mark. OnLogic will ship anywhere in the U.S., Canada and, at its discretion and under specific terms, to other international destinations.
The more complex a scene the more needs to be stored in the memory of your graphics card, and the faster that memory is the quicker it can be pulled out and flashed up on your gaming monitor. Texture fillrate is calculated as the number of TMUs multiplied by the base core clock speed. Solid graphics card, not close to top of the line but low power draw and can run all the games I play with all max settings.
And at 1440p half the benchmarks show that either the Super is as quick as the Ti or maybe even faster, with the latest GTX Turing card often delivering around 12% higher frame rates on average. We’re talking about affordable, mainstream graphics cards here, and so the 1080p performance gigabyte gtx 1060 3gb is arguably the most important metric with the Super card’s 1440p chops maybe a secondary consideration. But that higher spec memory does come into play at the higher resolutions, and no matter what, more often than not the Super is tangibly faster than the straight GTX 1660 version.
Using 1920×1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware. We saw a little bit of that in games like Project Cars 2, Prey and Shadow of the Tomb Raider. But we also saw a lot of gains in the vicinity of 7-13%, which is how we arrived at a 10% improvement on average.