Ryzen 5
Integrating the memory controller helps mitigate AMD’s weaker memory controller implementations. And when Intel did it too, we saw how AMD didn’t do it as well as Intel did. I remember how Randy Allen practically bragged about AMD’s integrated memory controller.
AMD still offers many of the same advantages, like unrestrained overclockability on all SKUs and most motherboards (the A-series is the lone exception), but has discarded bundled coolers for its Ryzen 9 and 7 processors. Luckily for entry-level buyers, the 65W Ryzen X is the only Ryzen model that comes with a bundled cooler, and it’s gtx 1090 adequate for most users. The AMD Ryzen X takes the throne as the no-compromise gaming chip for the mid-range, accentuated by class-leading application performance and power efficiency. Starting off with the Cinebench R23 test, the Lenovo Legion 5 managed to score 1157 and 7911 in single-core and multi-core tests respectively.
As before, AMD only guarantees its boost frequencies on a single core, and all-core boosts will vary based on the cooling solution, power delivery, and motherboard BIOS. The Ryzen X is the only Ryzen 5000 chip that comes with a bundled cooler, and we found that the Wraith Spire delivers enough thermal headroom for most workloads, but you’ll get a boost from better cooling in heavily-threaded workloads. You also shouldn’t expect any meaningful overclocking headroom with the Wraith Spire cooler. AMD increased the boost clock speeds, but it also reduced base frequencies compared to the previous-gen processors. AMD says that if you top the chip with an adequate cooler, it will rarely drop to the base frequency. We recorded many cases of a 4.55 GHz all-core boost with the Ryzen X, which certainly wasn’t possible with the previous-gen chips.
We chose the most demanding versions of both the DAWBench DSP and DAWBench VI tests from the project file to put as much hurt as possible on our test systems. AIDA64 offers a useful set of built-in directed benchmarks for assessing the performance gigabyte gtx 1060 3gb of the various subsystems of a CPU. The PhotoWorxx benchmark uses AVX2 on compatible CPUs, while the FPU Julia and Mandel tests use AVX2 with FMA. Still, it’s a great gaming CPU in its own right, and well worth considering for a new gaming PC.
This is a really handy feature, as it means that the processors are able to be more efficient at multitasking. When we first looked at the performance of AMD’s Ryzen 5 processors, I had a feeling that big changes were on the horizon for the midrange CPU market. The $250 Ryzen X is actually a hair faster than Intel’s $340 Core i7-7700K in most of our real-world testing, and it walks all over the $240 Core i5-7600K in all but a few lightly-threaded tests and synthetic benchmarks. The i5-7600K boasts much higher single-threaded performance than the Ryzen part, but that advantage only gives the Intel chip an edge in some games and for general desktop usage. Even so, one can hardly call the 1600X a pokey processor in those tasks thanks to its high clocks and XFR boost. Given its all-around competence, I think the Ryzen X is the chip to get for $250 right now.